|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
It's Time to Address Privacy
The industry needs to come together to educate consumers, journalists and privacy advocates—and end users—about RFID technologies.
The person who undertakes this task should not be someone who simply wants to shoot down every piece of legislation and encourage governments not to regulate RFID. Rather, the head of this body should be someone who understands that to achieve the benefits of RFID technology, companies need to respect consumer privacy and behave responsibly. He or she should have credibility among end users, vendors and the press and be able to promote best practices that protect consumers.
As this group educates companies about the benefits of adopting privacy best practices, it should also educate the public about what RFID can and can't do, and how companies are likely or unlikely to use the technology. Informed consumers can make intelligent choices about whether they want to shop in stores that use RFID. Unfortunately, almost every article written about RFID and privacy has had serious inaccuracies that hamper the public's ability to make an informed choice about whether this technology is good or bad for them, which is why educating journalists should be a high priority.
And when I say "educating," I don't mean just selling RFID—talking about all the potential benefits RFID could bring consumers, businesses and societies as a whole. I mean helping people understand the technology, the systems behind RFID and the business practices that will use RFID information. (As an aside, I wrote an article on Oct. 17, 2005—Target, Wal-Mart Share EPC Data—that must rank among the most misquoted articles in history. Although it clearly states that Wal-Mart and Target are sharing data with individual suppliers about the location of the suppliers' products in the supply chain, the story is repeatedly cited as refuting my oft-made claim that retailers won't share data about their customers with their competitors. It does nothing of the sort, as anyone who has actually read it would know.)
Finally, it is clear that the industry needs to create a universal label to be placed on all consumer products, indicating that the product contains an RFID tag. EPCglobal has its label. AIM Global has created its own for non-EPC RFID systems. But manufacturers don't want to have two or more labels on products that have RFID. It is imperative that we have a single, global label, and this group I'm proposing could help achieve that.
I think an organization that is not controlled by a single group—end users, vendors, standards bodies—within the RFID industry, one that focuses on getting companies to adopt best practices for protecting consumer privacy, educating the public at large and promoting standardized labeling, would be invaluable. If you agree, or if you think your organization would support the creation of such a group, please send an e-mail to email@example.com.
Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal. If you would like to comment on this article, click on the link below.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
|RFID Journal LIVE!||RFID in Health Care||LIVE! LatAm||LIVE! Brasil||LIVE! Europe||RFID Connect||Virtual Events||RFID Journal Awards||Webinars||Presentations|