Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Pharma Groups Respond to FDA RFID Report

Although eager to adopt the technology, the drug industry says obstacles still hinder widespread implementation.
By Beth Bacheldor
The HDMA, an association representing distributors of health-care products, agrees that there are still obstacles to RFID's widespread adoption within the pharmaceutical industry. In particular, real-time systems that allow for the sharing and management of RFID data have to be designed, and companies have to integrate new technologies into current business practices and legacy systems. "These changes and processes take time to implement," says Scott Melville, HDMA's senior vice president.

To help advance implementation of RFID and other track-and-trace technologies, the HDMA Foundation (the HDMA's research affiliate) has launched an initiative with the Rutgers University Center for Supply Chain Management to study the key issues of data sharing and data management in the health-care supply chain, Melville says.

Although the FDA stopped short of requiring the pharmaceutical industry to use radio frequency identification, it did call RFID "the most promising technology for implementing electronic track and trace in the drug supply chain," expressing disappointment that the industry had not made greater progress on using the technology in its supply chain.

In early 2004, the FDA stated its hope that by 2006, the supply chain would be using RFID tags at the individual item level for all drugs likely to be counterfeited. It also wanted the industry to be able to tag all drugs at the pallet, case and unit levels the following year (see FDA Endorses RFID Technology).

According to Goldhammer, the industry's slow uptake of RFID shouldn't be a surprise because the obstacles have not yet been overcome. He adds, however, that the FDA's decision to enforce the PDMA may encourage RFID's use. "I think, actually, the pedigree announcement may do more to spur [RFID] because no one wants to be pushing paper pedigrees around," he says. "I don't think there is any shortage of commitment to RFID on the part of the industry, but there is a lack of standards, the infrastructure is still uncertain and the return on investment is still somewhat complex."

Susan Bishop, director of regulatory affairs with the APhA's policy group, agrees that RFID may make it easier to implement a drug pedigree system. The organization's 57,000 members include practicing pharmacists, pharmaceutical scientists, student pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.

"There are some challenges with the paper [pedigree] system," Bishop says. "APhA has been concerned with the way the FDA has defined an authorized distributor, and that authorized distributors are not required to pass along the pedigree." Authorized distributors are only those that have written agreements with manufacturers; all other distributors are considered unauthorized.

Authorized distributors often sell drugs to unauthorized distributors, which then move the drugs further down the supply chain. Unauthorized distributors are required to produce a pedigree. "But if it wasn't provided by the authorized distributor, how do they get that information?" Bishop asks. "If the industry moves to RFID, it could eliminate that problem because the information would be attached to the product at the point of manufacture."

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
Simply enter a question for our experts.
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations