Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

What the Round Rock Settlements Mean

Motorola and Smartrac signed settlement agreements with Round Rock Research, which sued several retailers for patent infringement.
By Mark Roberti

In response, some companies being sued demanded defense and indemnification against Round Rock's claims of patent infringement from Motorola, under the indemnification clauses in their contracts with Motorola. In March 2012, Motorola filed a countersuit against Round Rock, challenging its claims. The ongoing litigation created some uncertainty—not only for the end users named in the lawsuits but also for potential customers concerned about being pulled into the patent dispute. Several RFID companies joined Motorola in a joint defense against the patents.

Meanwhile, to settle these claims, Round Rock asked the end users sued to pay a percentage of the benefits RFID delivers to them annually. This is a highly unusual tactic, according to patent lawyers we contacted. Typically, companies are asked to pay a flat licensing fee. The decision to ask for a percentage of the benefits RFID delivers created a problem for other passive UHF companies; potential customers began requesting indemnification. As one systems integrator put it: "If we do a $5 million project for a big retailer, we could wind up indemnifying them for many times that if RFID delivers a lot of benefit. We just can't do that."

The settlement does several things. It ends the suit for Walmart and Macy's if they comply with the agreement (both already use mostly Motorola readers). The framework of the settlement, which calls for Motorola and Smartrac to pay licensing fees, is nonexclusive, so other UHF RFID solution providers could sign similar agreements. In fact, at press time, Alien Technology, Avery Dennison RBIS and Invengo announced they had signed a licensing agreement with Round Rock (see Avery Dennison, Alien Technology and Invengo Sign Licensing Deals With Round Rock).

As of this writing, a company that wishes to deploy passive UHF RFID in the United States would need to use mostly tags and readers from the RFID firms that have settled with Round Rock, or buy readers and tags through Checkpoint Systems, which settled with Round Rock in May. To avoid losing out on potential new customers, tag and reader makers are now under pressure to sign similar agreements with Round Rock.

One concern some RFID technology buyers have expressed is that paying royalties to Round Rock will drive up the cost of equipment, particularly tags. Round Rock initially was asking for a licensing fee of 1 cent per tag. For a company such as Marks & Spencer, which expects to use 500 million tags annually, that would have amounted to an additional cost of $5 million per year. But a source who has seen the terms of the settlement says the royalty is nowhere near that high, and if a buyer commits to large purchases over a period of time, it can get an even lower royalty rate.

But the deal does create some issues for retailers. They will need to ensure they purchase mainly passive UHF readers from RFID companies that have settled with Round Rock (at least until 2019, when the most important patents expire). That's not so tough. Harder is ensuring a percentage of tags come from inlay providers that are licensed.

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

PREMIUM CONTENT
Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL
JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER
Loading
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations