Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Startup Company Seeks RFID and Other Patents

RPX Corp., which has already signed on a number of vendors with RFID products as members, is aggregating patents to protect high-tech companies from litigation.
By Beth Bacheldor
Apr 08, 2009RPX Corp., a startup firm that is buying various patent portfolios, including those involving radio frequency identification, in order to help high-tech companies fight patent assertions and associated litigation costs, has added five more member companies to its ranks, thus bringing the total number up to 11 since it began conducting business in November 2008. To date, RPX owns patents valued at more than $70 million, and has signed on as member companies Cisco, IBM, LG Electronics, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung and Seiko-Epson (all of which sell hardware, software or services involving RFID), as well as Shortel, TiVo and Vlingo.

The firm is doing what John Amster, RPX's co-CEO, calls defensive patent aggregation—that is, purchasing patents on behalf of its member companies in order to protect them from the growing number of non-practicing entities (NPEs) that acquire patents not to manufacture or market a patented invention, but to sue businesses they allege are infringing on the patents. Moreover, since NPEs do not sell products or services, they do not infringe on patent rights. Thus, companies are unable to counter-assert patents (which often occurs in patent battles among competitors).

John Amster
"There's been a lot of investment going into NPEs, and their goal is to use that money to go and acquire more patents," Amster says. "We came up with the idea that what the market needs is a company to act on behalf of very large group of companies, to be a defensive buyer that can provide a counterbalance to the NPEs."

According to Amster, there are more than 220 identified NPEs in the United States, with roughly 350 cases involving perhaps as many as 1,000 defendants filed by NPEs in 2008. "Just the legal cost alone is around $1 billion," Amster states, "and that is just in the cost, not any settlements. With that, it is probably a lot more—closer to $5 billion."

In the past decade, NPEs have raised in excess of $6 billion in private capital to acquire patents. What's more, offensively initiated lawsuits by NPEs in the United States grew nearly 300 percent during this period, and now represent 16 percent of all U.S. patent litigation, according to PatentFreedom, a research organization focused on the activities, techniques, staff, funding and patent holdings of NPEs. The rapid growth of patent lawsuits involving NPEs, PatentFreedom reports, has been fueled by the increased numbers of patents awarded, as well as the promise of big returns on relatively modest costs (the median price for a patent is approximately $100,000). A powerful example of that is the $612 million payment made by Research in Motion in 2006 to patent-holding company NTP.

Amster states that his firm is not out to sue anyone to make money. "We will never assert out patents to anybody; we'll always wear the white hat and will never threaten litigation, " he says. Instead, RPX's plan is to make money from the fees its members pay. The company is backed by blue-chip venture capital firms Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Charles River Ventures. Members pay an annual fee ranging from $35,000 to $4.9 million, based on a rate card that takes a member's operating income into account.


Reader 2009-04-08 06:23:27 PM
President Large companies like to talk about patent trolls when they get caught stealing others' patent property rights. This is backlash, because after many decades of taking pretty much what they wanted with impunity from inventors they are now being held accountable. If you are an inventor you need to carefully consider rather or not companies like RPX are going to give you fair value for your inventions. I am betting that the answer is no. Befor talking to these companies every inventor needs to understand what the true market value of their invention is. They also need to retain competent counsel to ensure that any contract they agree to is fair. Always bear in mind that companies like RPX are the buyers' representative. patent enforcement companies and contingency litigators are sellers representatives. When dealing with a sellers' representative an inventor can expect to see something in the range of 30 to 40 percent of the market value of their invention. This can amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, far more than the $100,000 mentioned in the artical. I am the founder of the Professional Inventors Alliance. We are inventors helping inventors. The invention business is much like the wild west and todays large corporate interests are just as bad as the railroads were when they stole settlers land. Do not allow yourself to be bambozled into getting only a small fraction of the value of your invention. Ronald J. Riley, Speaking only on my own behalf. Affiliations: President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org President - Alliance for American Innovation Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel Washington, DC Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
Reader 2009-04-09 07:30:57 AM
truth about trolls for the truth about trolls please see http://truereform.piausa.org

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
Simply enter a question for our experts.
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations