Researchers Warn RFID May Disrupt Medical EquipmentExperts not involved with the study note that there have been no reports of injuries caused by electromagnetic interference with medical devices, though they do recommend further study.
Jun 25, 2008—A new study published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association warns that radio frequency identification may disrupt the operation of defibrillators and other medical equipment, and occasionally induce "potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices." Experts not involved in the study note that no injuries related to electromagnetic interference (EMI) have been reported in an actual clinical setting, but recommend that before deploying a specific RFID system, a hospital should test it first to see if it has any effect on the medical devices the facility uses.
The study, conducted by Remko van der Togt, Erik Jan van Lieshout, and four of their colleagues at the University of Amsterdam's Academic Medical Center (AMC), in the Netherlands, was part of a research project entitled RFID in Health Care, initiated by the Dutch Ministry of Health in May 2006. That project has been focused on the use of RFID to track and trace blood products and expensive medical supplies in the operating rooms, intensive care unit (ICU) and blood transfusion lab at the 1,002-bed hospital. Few formal studies have been conducted investigating whether RFID systems interfere with the operation of medical devices, but the technology's use has been growing in the health-care sector, particularly to track such devices. Many of those implementations involve Wi-Fi-enabled real-time location systems (RTLS), which the University of Amsterdam did not test during its study. Additionally, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been considering using RFID as a unique device identification (UDI) mechanism for tracking and tracing medical devices in the supply chain (see FDA Works on Draft ID System for Medical Devices, Supplies). In January 2007, the agency published a draft guidance document addressing issues and concerns relating to the use of RF wireless technology in medical devices, including whether RFID's electromagnetic waves could interfere with such devices. The FDA is currently evaluating the commentary and input it received on this issue last year. According to Peper Long, a spokeswoman for the FDA, the agency has not yet received any reports of injuries directly caused by electromagnetic interference with medical devices. "We certainly understand there is a potential for problems," she says, "and, of course, we are looking into this." In fact, Long notes, the FDA is working with standards organizations and device manufacturers to evaluate RFID's impact on device performance, and to discern whether any vulnerabilities would create a public health concern. The University of Amsterdam study was carried out in a controlled, nonclinical setting specifically to assess and classify incidents of EMI by RFID on critical care equipment. The researchers set up two RFID systems—one consisting of a 124 kHz battery-powered tag and a reader, the other a passive 868 MHz tag and interrogator. Both systems employed in the test (the active system is from Avonwood, while the passive is made by Feig Electronic) comply with RFID standards set forth by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). Forty-one separate devices—such as defibrillators, infusion pumps, ventilators, fluid warmers and pacemaker programmers—from a variety of medical equipment manufacturers were included in the tests, which were conducted in a one-bed patient room at the hospital, though no patients were involved in the testing. USER COMMENTS
Login and post your comment!Not a member? Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com! |
PREMIUM CONTENT
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS Simply enter a question for our experts. JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTICLES
PREMIUM CONTENT
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
