Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Why All This IoT Heel-Dragging?

Two impediments are keeping the Internet of Things from truly disrupting industrial companies.
By Rick Veague

Increasing Sophistication in IoT Data Collection
Even with what appears to be incremental growth, the sophistication level of IoT application has been jumping by double digits year-over-year. Data from our study reveals several interesting upward trendlines during a 12-month period between 2017 and 2018. It shows:

• Companies collecting IoT data on entire work cells or production lines rather than individual machine components or individual machines increased by 17 percent. • This, in turn, enables more advanced use cases, which helps explain a 30 percent increase in the use of IoT technology to support asset performance management. • Respondents using the IoT to monitor their customers' equipment saw a 10 percent increase, potentially signaling transformational approaches to field service management.

I predict we may see two waves of IoT investment, the first focused on enabling more thorough and strategic data collection, with a second wave (or series of subsequent waves) focused on making more complete use of the data collected. For example, in the early stages, data collected about customer equipment may help manufacturers troubleshoot, but at later stages, it could drive an automated field service value chain in which the equipment sends its own work orders.

In time, I also believe these sensors will support servitized business models, as manufacturers may charge a customer for productivity and outcomes—duty cycles, products manufactured, hours of operation—rather than for a discrete product. There's no stopping the move toward greater interplay of the IoT and business systems. There are some obstacles in the road, however, including a hazy vision of how to build a viable use case based on different company needs.

There is a role for software and technology vendors to play along this journey as well. Enterprise software vendors must deliver simple and predictable pathways for IoT data to travel through the core transactional systems that underpin companies and automate processes or provide actionable analysis. Once these two barriers are overcome, we'll see a much greater surge in IoT adoption as part of a revenue-generating business strategy.

As CTO of IFS in North America, Rick Veague has responsibility for the company's product and industry solutions offered to customers and partners throughout the United States and Canada. Rick joined IFS in 1999, and has held positions developing, marketing and delivering high-value business applications, including ERP, FSM, EAM and MRO solutions.

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

PREMIUM CONTENT
Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL
JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER
Loading
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations