Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

The Challenge of Choosing the Best of the Best

Selecting the top RFID deployments in any given year is very difficult, but it is worth the effort.
By Mark Roberti
Mar 18, 2013

My father, a mathematician who solved Fermat's Last Theorem, never voted in a local, state or federal election throughout his 83 years. That might strike you as an odd opening sentence for a column about radio frequency identification, but it is relevant. You'll see why after I explain why my father never voted.

My father knew that the courts in New York State chose jurors from among registered voter rolls. He was fairly political, but he never registered to vote because he did not want to ever be a juror. "You cannot judge another man," he would say, "until you have walked in his shoes."

I used to argue with him about this, saying that while that might be true, it was not a reason to avoid serving as a juror. If everyone took his position, then a single judge would have the right to convict people or settle lawsuits, and that would likely produce a worse result. It was better, I argued, to have an imperfect jury system than to have no jury system at all.

The same is true with the RFID Journal Awards. Each year, a panel of industry academics and thought leaders attempts to select the best RFID implementation, the most innovative use of RFID, the best use of RFID to enhance a product or service, the best use of RFID to help the environment and the best new product (see Meet the Judges). This is a herculean task, as the deployments cover many industries and applications, the vast majority of submissions are impressive, and trying to narrow the list down to only three finalists in each category is difficult.

This year, some of the judges sent me long paragraphs explaining why they chose a particular entry over another, and they often included commentary about submissions that didn't make their top three, but were still worthy of recognition. "There's something to be said about this smaller-scale project before dismissing it," wrote Harold Boeck, a professor at the Université du Québec à Montréal, regarding one project that didn't make his top three. "It's a real-life-practical-small-scale-everyday-operations project that anyone can accomplish. The project required no consultants or systems integrator and was entirely done in-house, and installation time was only a few hours. The project demonstrates clear benefits and a rapid, clearly defined ROI that anyone can achieve if they put their minds to it."

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
Simply enter a question for our experts.
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations