EECC Tests Find Big Performance Differences for Tags Read in Bulk
For the European EPC Competence Center's latest annual report, researchers tested dozens of EPC Gen 2 RFID tag models, and discovered that, while performance overall is better than ever, some models suffer a dramatic drop in read rate when packed closely together.
Sep 22, 2010—A new report from the European EPC Competence Center (EECC) has found that the performance of ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) EPC Gen 2 tags has improved vastly from earlier technology. However, the study also notes that read rate (the percentage of tags successfully read) drops in bulk environments (in which many tags are packed within close proximity to each other), sometimes by as much as 85 percent. On the other hand, the report indicates, the better-performing tags experienced a reduction in read rate of only about 20 percent.
"The most surprising point was that the read range through the proximity effect (tags in bulk) sometimes increases up to 20 percent," says Conrad von Bonin, EECC's manager. In this case, it was the tags on the outer ends of the group that could be read at an increased distance from a reader. "It is not clear why," von Bonin says. "In general, all tag types experience a decrease (in read range) in large populations."
UHF Tag Performance Survey (UTPS) 2010 report, EECC researchers studied tags for both metal and non-metal environments, as well as two new chips: Impinj's Monza 4 and NXP Semiconductors' G2iL, both of which, according to the report, had a longer read range and a higher read rate than the companies' prior offerings.
The EECC has completed UTPS studies annually since 2007. The first year, the center tested 20 EPC Gen 2 tag models (see European EPC Competence Center Releases UHF Tag Study), but the number of tag models tested this year—approximately 70—was twice the number examined in 2009, and included tags provided by Asian companies for the first time, as well as bulk-read (proximity) measurements.
Due to the increased use of RFID tags in high volume, such as by retailers with item- or carton-level tagging for merchandise, the group chose to conduct the study to determine how well UHF EPC Gen 2 tags operated in a crowded environment with many tags close to each other. This may be the first study to measure the effects of close proximity of EPC Gen 2 tag reads, von Bonin says, and it may be important to the retail market. For example, Wal-Mart Stores recently began working with its suppliers to attach tags on men's jeans and undergarments (see Wal-Mart Relaunches EPC RFID Effort, Starting With Men's Jeans and Basics), while in Germany, he adds, retailers such as Metro Group are planning to begin tagging crates of goods being shipped to stores.
According to the EECC's latest report, there is a growing number of item-level applications in which tagged items are often packed very close to each other, resulting in a tag-to-tag distance of as little as 1 centimeter (0.4 inch). The study provides recommendations for the appropriate transponder types for particular applications, including bulk-reading environments for such items as CDs and DVDs, books, apparel and electronics.
The report is based on tests carried out by four researchers working 12 hours a day for five months at the EECC's lab in Neuss, Germany. For proximity testing, the team placed 11 tags of the same make and model 1 centimeter apart on a honeycombed plastic brick measuring 12 centimeters by 24 centimeters (4.7 inches by 9.4 inches). Tests were conducted to simulate U.S., E.U. and Japanese regulatory conditions, taking into account the 866 MHz, 910 MHz, 922 MHz and 953 MHz UHF RF bands sanctioned, respectively, by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the United States' Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Japan's Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB). Measurements of each tag's backscatter and read ranges were carried out at the three different RF bands approved by these organizations, with the reader set at power levels ranging from 15 dBm to 45 dBm. The measurements were taken with the tag positioned at various horizontal and vertical orientations. In the case of horizontal reads, the tags were mounted horizontally and rotated 360 degrees. To analyze the vertical plane, the tags were positioned vertically and turned 90 degrees, always 1 meter (3.3 feet) from the reader antenna. This amounted to more than 3,000 individual measurements for each tag.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.