Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Tech Companies Hate the Physical World

Google, Apple, Microsoft and other technology giants are not getting behind RFID. Perhaps the reason is that the real world is just too messy.
By Mark Roberti
Jan 07, 2019

During the holidays, I read a bunch of articles about 2019 being the year of artificial intelligence (AI), or at least a year in which the big tech companies—Apple, Google and Microsoft—will increase their efforts to be the leaders in developing AI software and devices. I started wondering why AI would be viewed as so critical to their futures, whereas a technology like radio frequency identification, which delivers the data needed for computers to understand the real world, would not be.

There could be a few reasons for this. AI algorithms are proprietary, so a company that develops truly advanced AI would have a competitive advantage over other firms. RFID technology involves the capturing of large amounts of data. AI can be applied to that data, but the raw information is more of a commodity.

Another reason is that Google, Apple and Microsoft are more focused on consumers than on businesses. Having assistants that make a person's life easier, better or happier can lead to big sales. Telling them where their socks are located is probably not the way to generate billions of dollars in new revenue.

But here's the thing that puzzles me: the biggest problem that companies face is not analyzing their data. It's managing the physical objects they make, move or sell. Retailers know which products sell and which ones don't. What they struggle with is managing their inventory—keeping the things that sell on shelves, so that they can sell more.

Manufactures struggle with where their tools and parts are located, which finished inventory should be shipped first, and so on. Logistics companies are able to analyze the data they have regarding their fleets' performance. What they lack is a handle on where their chassis are located, where containers have been stored, and where jacks, carts and other items can be found.

Why are none of the tech giants focused on solving these issues using RFID? Clearly, there is a lot of money to be made if a firm can address these issues. One reason, of course, is that they see little near-term revenue in it—and investors demand near-term profits. But I think another reason is that the tech giants are just not that comfortable with the real world, which is messy and difficult to control.

In cyberspace, all you need to worry about are bits and bytes. There are no issues with physical objects ending up missing, products being stolen, metal walls blocking RF signals, humans forgetting to scan bar codes, or many other issues that make operating in the real world more difficult than merely processing ones and zeroes.

There is a huge business opportunity in breaking down the barrier between the real and digital worlds. That's why RFID firms have been investing in improving their tags and readers to the point at which they are extremely consistent in collecting data. But it will take time for companies to realize there are big benefits in solving real-world problems, because they are being distracted by a lot of hype surrounding artificial intelligence.

Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal.

  • Previous Page
  • 1
  • Next Page

USER COMMENTS

Mark Hill 2019-01-07 06:14:13 PM
It’s risky to assume that the observed messiness of the physical work is an inalterable constant, rather than an artifact of current business models. Sometimes the best way to solve real-world problems is not by adding yet another technology layer to an established process, but by leveraging technology to serve customers in a fundamentally new way. Ted Levit taught us that customers don’t want 1/4” drills, they want 1/4” holes. In apparel, shoppers want items that fit the way they want, and look the way they want, with minimum expenditure of time, effort, and money. Rather than ensuring accuracy of inventory pushed to hundreds of stores, would your customer be better served by a Bonobos Guide Shop model with samples to try on, and then fulfillment via UPS from well-controlled inventory in a DC? It’s time to rethink business models much more thoroughly.
Paul Slaby 2019-01-08 12:42:22 PM
Certainly most of the attention and action is currently focused on data, software and internet applications rather than hardware and hardware based systems. This is clearly visible in funding and valuation realities. One way for RFID industry players to address this is to position itself as IoT passive connectivity suppliers enabling IoT Smart Spaces, expanding IoT connectivity to the edge, delivering Big Data, feeding unique AI Applications. Novel RFID technologies, such as the one pioneered by Teslonix, offer true extensions to the existing IoT networks connecting passive (battery-free) "objects" and providing locationing (RTLS) down to ~ 1ft accuracy.

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

PREMIUM CONTENT
Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL
JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER
Loading
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations