|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
Why RFID Is the Only Viable Path for Life-Saving Smart Gun Technology
Radio frequency identification offers the only feasible commercial approach to reducing the plague of gun violence in the United States.
Significantly, the additional cache of being used by a variety of police departments that carry out months and months of testing before changing gear generated a significant halo effect for the much larger consumer market. After all, if the NYPD and the FBI are carrying Glocks, who in their right mind with any degree of credibility is going to question the reliability of a new type of firearm?
And therein lies the problem with the sexier biometric approach: they don't work for the strategically crucial law-enforcement market. Police wear gloves or get mud, sweat and blood on their hands, which often precludes accurate thumbprint readings. On the other hand, RFID is proven and binary simple. One well known German smart gun developer, Ernst Mauch, the former CEO of Heckler and Koch, has already developed an RFID smart gun that has passed rigid testing in all types of extreme weather and has proven its reliability 99.99 percent of the time.
An alternative path some are considering for a biometric smart gun is a direct sales approach to end users. But how many consumers are going to buy a new firearm with new technology sight unseen, particularly one that the gun rights crowd is going to push back on with every ounce of effort? The direct-sales channel for even proven brands of firearms is quite small. At best, it's hard to see annual sales of more than 10,000 biometric smart guns direct to consumers, not to mention the steep advertising and marketing costs and significant expense for product returns.
The smallest gun manufacturers in the United States sell around 60,000 firearms annually. This is not a coincidence, but a matter of economics, as 60,000 to 80,000 unit sales annually is just about breakeven for a firearms manufacturer. A company that sold just 10,000 firearms annually would lose millions of dollars, in addition to the $10 million or so for the initial cost to set up manufacturing and effectively prove its viability in field testing. It's not likely that any reasonable capitalist would invest in such a business model.
The main thing holding up investment in smart guns at the moment is a New Jersey law that offended the gun rights group by mandating all guns sold in that state be smart guns once such weapons became commercially available. It proved to be an unnecessary overreach by some well-meaning legislators and public health experts, given that two separate large research studies have since shown that buying interest for smart guns is above 40 percent of all gun owners. But to get there, they have to overcome pushback from hardcore gun lovers—and to achieve that, they have to successfully sell to law enforcement. And in that critical important market, only an RFID smart gun approach will suffice.
Ralph Fascitelli has been the board president of Washington CeaseFire, a leading Seattle-based civic activist group dedicated to reducing gun violence, for 11 years. He assumed that position shortly after the successful sale of his high-tech ad agency Imagio to WPP. Ralph firmly believes RFID smart guns can have a significant, non-partisan impact on gun violence. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
|RFID Journal LIVE!||RFID in Health Care||LIVE! LatAm||LIVE! Brasil||LIVE! Europe||RFID Connect||Virtual Events||RFID Journal Awards||Webinars||Presentations|