Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Researchers Warn RFID May Disrupt Medical Equipment

Experts not involved with the study note that there have been no reports of injuries caused by electromagnetic interference with medical devices, though they do recommend further study.
By Beth Bacheldor
Jun 25, 2008A new study published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association warns that radio frequency identification may disrupt the operation of defibrillators and other medical equipment, and occasionally induce "potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices." Experts not involved in the study note that no injuries related to electromagnetic interference (EMI) have been reported in an actual clinical setting, but recommend that before deploying a specific RFID system, a hospital should test it first to see if it has any effect on the medical devices the facility uses.

The study, conducted by Remko van der Togt, Erik Jan van Lieshout, and four of their colleagues at the University of Amsterdam's Academic Medical Center (AMC), in the Netherlands, was part of a research project entitled RFID in Health Care, initiated by the Dutch Ministry of Health in May 2006. That project has been focused on the use of RFID to track and trace blood products and expensive medical supplies in the operating rooms, intensive care unit (ICU) and blood transfusion lab at the 1,002-bed hospital.

Few formal studies have been conducted investigating whether RFID systems interfere with the operation of medical devices, but the technology's use has been growing in the health-care sector, particularly to track such devices. Many of those implementations involve Wi-Fi-enabled real-time location systems (RTLS), which the University of Amsterdam did not test during its study.

Additionally, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been considering using RFID as a unique device identification (UDI) mechanism for tracking and tracing medical devices in the supply chain (see FDA Works on Draft ID System for Medical Devices, Supplies). In January 2007, the agency published a draft guidance document addressing issues and concerns relating to the use of RF wireless technology in medical devices, including whether RFID's electromagnetic waves could interfere with such devices. The FDA is currently evaluating the commentary and input it received on this issue last year.

According to Peper Long, a spokeswoman for the FDA, the agency has not yet received any reports of injuries directly caused by electromagnetic interference with medical devices. "We certainly understand there is a potential for problems," she says, "and, of course, we are looking into this." In fact, Long notes, the FDA is working with standards organizations and device manufacturers to evaluate RFID's impact on device performance, and to discern whether any vulnerabilities would create a public health concern.

The University of Amsterdam study was carried out in a controlled, nonclinical setting specifically to assess and classify incidents of EMI by RFID on critical care equipment. The researchers set up two RFID systems—one consisting of a 124 kHz battery-powered tag and a reader, the other a passive 868 MHz tag and interrogator. Both systems employed in the test (the active system is from Avonwood, while the passive is made by Feig Electronic) comply with RFID standards set forth by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). Forty-one separate devices—such as defibrillators, infusion pumps, ventilators, fluid warmers and pacemaker programmers—from a variety of medical equipment manufacturers were included in the tests, which were conducted in a one-bed patient room at the hospital, though no patients were involved in the testing.

USER COMMENTS

Reader 2008-06-25 07:57:07 PM
Why even install this technology? Isn't a barcode enough for hospitals? Why use this technology for this purpose? it seems unnecessarily cumbersome and expensive to employ and unlikely to increase efficiency.
Wang S 2008-06-26 12:13:44 AM
http://to.swang.googlepages.com/rfid There is a good overview of RFID. possibly a little bit aged. http://to.swang.googlepages.com/rfid something useful
Mark Volkomener 2008-06-26 03:57:13 PM
RFID EMI I read that Dutch study and they did not test today’s 2 GHz units. Most medical equipment today communicate wirelessly in 802.11g (2 GHz) so if there were a problem, they would do it to them selves. Our entire hospital complex is wired with 802.11g nodes and they are not interfering. we have contacted Alaris, our pump manufacturer, and the only stipulation they gave us is not to drill any holes in the chassis. In any case, we are testing our equipment with 802.11g RFID sample units just to document that we did. So far, no problems found (yet). Mark Volkomener CBET Clinical Engineering Network Security/Video Admin. Benefis Healthcare 1101 26th St S Great Falls, Montana 59405 Phone: 406.455.4252 Fax: 406.455.4144 volkmare@benefis.org -------------

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

PREMIUM CONTENT
Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL
JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER
Loading
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations
© Copyright 2002-2016 RFID Journal LLC.
Powered By: Haycco