Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Access This Premium Content

Options To Access This Article:

What Subscribers Are Saying

  • "Probably the best investment I've ever made."
    Steve Meizlish, President & CEO, MeizCorp Services, Inc.
  • "I have found that RFID Journal provides an objective viewpoint of RFID. It you are looking for a resource that provides insights as to the application and implications of deploying RFID, RFID Journal will meet your needs, It gives you a broad perspective of RFID, beyond the retail supply chain."
    Mike O'Shea, Director of Corporate AutoID/RFID Strategies & Technologies, Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  • "No other source provides the consistent value-added insight that Mark Robert and his staff do. In a world dominated by press release after press release, RFID Journal is developing as the one place to go to make the most sense out of the present and future of RFID in commerce."
    Bob Hurley, Project Leader for RFID, Bayer HealthCare's Consumer Care Division
  • "RFID Journal is the one go-to source for information on the latest in RFID technology."
    Bruce Keim, Director, Hewlett-Packard
  • "RFID Journal is the only source I need to keep up to the minute with the happenings in the RFID world."
    Blair Hawley, VP of Supply Chain, Remington Products Company

The High Cost of Patent Trolls

Companies whose business is threatening alleged infringers exact money that could fund innovation.
By Kevin Ashton
Dec 01, 2011—As a child, I enjoyed the Norwegian fairy tale "The Three Billy Goats Gruff." In the story, the three goats need to cross a bridge to find food, but a troll threatens to gobble them up if they attempt to pass.

In the RFID world today, we, too, face trolls, only they're called "patent trolls"—people who hold generally worthless patents but threaten companies with legal action for infringing on them unless they pay a large fee. Often, trolls acquire patents for technology they did not develop, buying them for little money from companies that are bankrupt or not seeking to enforce them. Patent trolls do not build anything, nor do they intend to do so. Their entire business model is centered on threatening legal action for patent violation.

The only thing these trolls seem to be good at is making it difficult to take any action against them, regardless of the merits of their claims, which are usually weak. The U.S. patent system makes it hard to quickly dismiss these claims, so while the price of buying off the patent trolls is high, it is lower and less risky than the price of fighting them. Consequently, most companies threatened by trolls decide it's easier and quicker just to pay them. Patent trolls make a lot of money.

In the fairy tale, the troll makes a fatal error. The goats persuade him to obstruct just the biggest and strongest of the three, who simply knocks him off the bridge. The patent trolls have learned from this mistake: They never go after the big companies that might have pockets deep enough to fight them; they focus on smaller players, often startups, that can't afford the dollars or distraction of a fight.

These payments—really nothing more than legal blackmail—are a major drag on the RFID industry (most other tech industries face a similar plight). RFID technology providers could use that money to fund research and development to make better products, lower prices for end users or pay investors. Instead, it goes to people with no intention of ever making anything useful for the advancement of business or the betterment of humanity.

What's the solution? New patent laws—and there are two that could fix all this quickly. One would be to let companies defend themselves from trolls as a group—to take class actions to invalidate patent trolls' patents. The other would be to require anyone asserting a patent to be in the process of making a commercially useful product that incorporates the patent.

These new laws would be within the spirit of the current patent laws, which are intended to encourage useful innovation, but as far as I know, they are not being considered. Until they are, only the fairy tale has a happy ending.

Kevin Ashton was cofounder and executive director of the Auto-ID Center.
To continue reading this article, please log in or choose a purchase option.

Option 1: Become a Premium Member.

One-year subscription, unlimited access to Premium Content: $189

Gain access to all of our premium content and receive 10% off RFID Reports and RFID Events!

Option 2: Purchase access to this specific article.

This article contains 473 words and 1 page. Purchase Price: $19.99

Upgrade now, and you'll get immediate access to:

  • Case Studies

    Our in-dept case-study articles show you, step by step, how early adopters assessed the business case for an application, piloted it and rolled out the technology.

    Free Sample: How Cognizant Cut Costs by Deploying RFID to Track IT Assets

  • Best Practices

    The best way to avoid pitfalls is to know what best practices early adopters have already established. Our best practices have helped hundreds of companies do just that.

  • How-To Articles

    Don’t waste time trying to figure out how to RFID-enable a forklift, or deciding whether to use fixed or mobile readers. Our how-to articles provide practical advice and reliable answers to many implementation questions.

  • Features

    These informative articles focus on adoption issues, standards and other important trends in the RFID industry.

    Free Sample: Europe Is Rolling Out RFID

  • Magazine Articles

    All RFID Journal Premium Subscribers receive our bimonthly RFID Journal print magazine at no extra cost, and also have access to the complete online archive of magazine articles from past years.

Become a member today!

RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations