Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Access This Premium Content

Options To Access This Article:

What Subscribers Are Saying

  • "Probably the best investment I've ever made."
    Steve Meizlish, President & CEO, MeizCorp Services, Inc.
  • "I have found that RFID Journal provides an objective viewpoint of RFID. It you are looking for a resource that provides insights as to the application and implications of deploying RFID, RFID Journal will meet your needs, It gives you a broad perspective of RFID, beyond the retail supply chain."
    Mike O'Shea, Director of Corporate AutoID/RFID Strategies & Technologies, Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  • "No other source provides the consistent value-added insight that Mark Robert and his staff do. In a world dominated by press release after press release, RFID Journal is developing as the one place to go to make the most sense out of the present and future of RFID in commerce."
    Bob Hurley, Project Leader for RFID, Bayer HealthCare's Consumer Care Division
  • "RFID Journal is the one go-to source for information on the latest in RFID technology."
    Bruce Keim, Director, Hewlett-Packard
  • "RFID Journal is the only source I need to keep up to the minute with the happenings in the RFID world."
    Blair Hawley, VP of Supply Chain, Remington Products Company

Governments Must Address RFID Privacy Issues

Privacy advocates have legitimate concerns caused by the use of radio frequency identification technology in identity documents, recyclables, libraries and schools.
By Mark Roberti
Oct 01, 2010—Ever since the United States announced plans to put radio frequency identification transponders in passports, back in 2005, privacy advocates have been concerned about the use of RFID in identity documents. Recent news that schools are using RFID to monitor children and that more local governments are using it to track recyclables has brought the issue to the surface once again. Privacy supporters claim the technology will be abused, and consumer privacy will be the victim.

Governments have often failed to address the potential for the technology to be abused, or at least privacy advocates' concerns about potential abuses. In August, the Associated Press reported that California's Contra Costa County planned to have students wear RFID-tagged jerseys at school. The tags would be used to track children's movements and monitor whether they have eaten lunch each day. The goal is to reduce costs by eliminating the need for teachers to manually track each child's attendance and meals.

Photo: iStockphoto

News reports did not indicate whether the county planned to track students with short-range passive RFID technology or longer-range active RFID, nor did they say whether the tags would be secure. Some bloggers expressed fears that children could be tracked with RFID by pedophiles or estranged spouses.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit association that addresses issues related to free speech, privacy, innovation and consumer rights, expressed additional concerns: "An RFID chip allows for far more than that minimal [manual] record-keeping. Instead, it provides the potential for nearly constant monitoring of a child's physical location. If readings are taken often enough, you could create an extraordinarily detailed portrait of a child's school day—one that's easy to imagine being misused, particularly as the chips substitute for direct adult monitoring and judgment.

If RFID records show a child moving around a lot, could she be tagged as hyperactive? If he doesn't move around a lot, could he get a reputation for laziness? How long will this data and the conclusions rightly or wrongly drawn from it be stored in these children's school records? Can parents opt-out of this invasive tracking? How many other federal grants are underwriting programs like these?"

Also in August, the Cleveland City Council approved spending of $2.5 million on RFID-enabled trash carts for 25,000 households across the city. The city began testing RFID technology to track recyclables with 15,000 households in 2007. It plans to identify and fine ($100) each household that fails to recycle. Former U.S. Congressman Bob Barr said the plan represented "an unholy alliance between business and government in expanding the reach of Big Brother."
To continue reading this article, please log in or choose a purchase option.

Option 1: Become a Premium Member.

One-year subscription, unlimited access to Premium Content: $189

Gain access to all of our premium content and receive 10% off RFID Reports and RFID Events!

Option 2: Purchase access to this specific article.

This article contains 1,454 words and 4 pages. Purchase Price: $19.99

Upgrade now, and you'll get immediate access to:

  • Case Studies

    Our in-dept case-study articles show you, step by step, how early adopters assessed the business case for an application, piloted it and rolled out the technology.

    Free Sample: How Cognizant Cut Costs by Deploying RFID to Track IT Assets

  • Best Practices

    The best way to avoid pitfalls is to know what best practices early adopters have already established. Our best practices have helped hundreds of companies do just that.

  • How-To Articles

    Don’t waste time trying to figure out how to RFID-enable a forklift, or deciding whether to use fixed or mobile readers. Our how-to articles provide practical advice and reliable answers to many implementation questions.

  • Features

    These informative articles focus on adoption issues, standards and other important trends in the RFID industry.

    Free Sample: Europe Is Rolling Out RFID

  • Magazine Articles

    All RFID Journal Premium Subscribers receive our bimonthly RFID Journal print magazine at no extra cost, and also have access to the complete online archive of magazine articles from past years.

Become a member today!

RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations