Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Access This Premium Content

Options To Access This Article:

What Subscribers Are Saying

  • "Probably the best investment I've ever made."
    Steve Meizlish, President & CEO, MeizCorp Services, Inc.
  • "I have found that RFID Journal provides an objective viewpoint of RFID. It you are looking for a resource that provides insights as to the application and implications of deploying RFID, RFID Journal will meet your needs, It gives you a broad perspective of RFID, beyond the retail supply chain."
    Mike O'Shea, Director of Corporate AutoID/RFID Strategies & Technologies, Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  • "No other source provides the consistent value-added insight that Mark Robert and his staff do. In a world dominated by press release after press release, RFID Journal is developing as the one place to go to make the most sense out of the present and future of RFID in commerce."
    Bob Hurley, Project Leader for RFID, Bayer HealthCare's Consumer Care Division
  • "RFID Journal is the one go-to source for information on the latest in RFID technology."
    Bruce Keim, Director, Hewlett-Packard
  • "RFID Journal is the only source I need to keep up to the minute with the happenings in the RFID world."
    Blair Hawley, VP of Supply Chain, Remington Products Company

The End of Trial and Error

The RFID Alliance Lab conducted more than 5,000 tests on the 10 commercially available UHF EPC tags. This article, adapted from the lab’s first report, will help companies make smart decisions about which tags are best for their products.
By Daniel Deavours
Feb 01, 2005—All around the world, companies are preparing to deploy RFID systems based on EPCglobal’s Class 1 and Class 0 Electronic Product Code specifications. Many companies are struggling to find the right UHF tag for their particular products. They are placing tags on cases of razors, bottled water, canned soup and myriad other products, and sending the cases round and round on a conveyor. When a tag can’t be read on a particular case, companies change the tag’s location on the case and try again. Most of these tests are unscientific. What’s worse, this trial-and-error approach is time-consuming, labor-intensive and wasteful.

To provide reliable, unbiased information that end users can employ to make decisions about which tags are likely to perform best on particular product types, the RFID Alliance Lab, a not-for-profit facility, tested 10 UHF EPC tags that were available in commercial quantities in October 2004. The tags were from Alien Technology, Avery Dennison, Matrics (now owned by Symbol) and UPM Rafsec.

The lab test results (see graphs) show how each tag performed in “free air”—that is, the tag was not attached to or near any product or surface. These tests provide a baseline for judging the tags. They show how the tags perform under ideal conditions, and since all environmental factors were scientifically controlled, the tests show differences in performance that are attributable only to the design and construction of the tag (some tags are tuned to work near water and don’t work well in free air). Free-air testing also reveals how tags will perform around “easy,” or “RF-friendly,” materials such as dry cardboard containers that are empty or filled with RF-friendly products such as paper towels.

Because water and metal can greatly affect the performance of the tags, we also tested the tags on a metal plate and on an aquarium filled with water. When an RFID tag is placed very close to an object, that object can change the characteristics of the antenna in several ways. Since nearly all RFID tag antennas are resonant (they respond in a narrow frequency band), materials close to antennas can alter their resonant frequency. Antennas on tags designed to work well near some products can be detuned if placed near other products. Materials can also reflect RF energy and interfere with the reader-tag communication. As with the free-air tests, we carefully controlled all of the environmental factors that could affect the results of the metal and water tests. The aim was to ensure that any differences in performance were due to the characteristics and design of the tags and not to external factors, such as electromagnetic interference.
To continue reading this article, please log in or choose a purchase option.

Option 1: Become a Premium Member.

One-year subscription, unlimited access to Premium Content: $189

Gain access to all of our premium content and receive 10% off RFID Reports and RFID Events!

Option 2: Purchase access to this specific article.

This article contains 2,097 words and 4 pages. Purchase Price: $19.99

Upgrade now, and you'll get immediate access to:

  • Case Studies

    Our in-dept case-study articles show you, step by step, how early adopters assessed the business case for an application, piloted it and rolled out the technology.

    Free Sample: How Cognizant Cut Costs by Deploying RFID to Track IT Assets

  • Best Practices

    The best way to avoid pitfalls is to know what best practices early adopters have already established. Our best practices have helped hundreds of companies do just that.

  • How-To Articles

    Don’t waste time trying to figure out how to RFID-enable a forklift, or deciding whether to use fixed or mobile readers. Our how-to articles provide practical advice and reliable answers to many implementation questions.

  • Features

    These informative articles focus on adoption issues, standards and other important trends in the RFID industry.

    Free Sample: Europe Is Rolling Out RFID

  • Magazine Articles

    All RFID Journal Premium Subscribers receive our bimonthly RFID Journal print magazine at no extra cost, and also have access to the complete online archive of magazine articles from past years.

Become a member today!

RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations