Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Access This Premium Content

Options To Access This Article:

What Subscribers Are Saying

  • "Probably the best investment I've ever made."
    Steve Meizlish, President & CEO, MeizCorp Services, Inc.
  • "I have found that RFID Journal provides an objective viewpoint of RFID. It you are looking for a resource that provides insights as to the application and implications of deploying RFID, RFID Journal will meet your needs, It gives you a broad perspective of RFID, beyond the retail supply chain."
    Mike O'Shea, Director of Corporate AutoID/RFID Strategies & Technologies, Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  • "No other source provides the consistent value-added insight that Mark Robert and his staff do. In a world dominated by press release after press release, RFID Journal is developing as the one place to go to make the most sense out of the present and future of RFID in commerce."
    Bob Hurley, Project Leader for RFID, Bayer HealthCare's Consumer Care Division
  • "RFID Journal is the one go-to source for information on the latest in RFID technology."
    Bruce Keim, Director, Hewlett-Packard
  • "RFID Journal is the only source I need to keep up to the minute with the happenings in the RFID world."
    Blair Hawley, VP of Supply Chain, Remington Products Company

U.S. Army Uses RFID to Track and Manage Parachutes

With no room for error, the chain-of custody solution reduces costs and labor and improves safety.
By Bob Violino
Aug 10, 2014

Since it began using parachutes in 1943, the U.S. Army has tracked and managed the equipment via manual methods that are labor-intensive, error-prone and susceptible to malicious tampering. In the early 2000s, the Army reclassified personal parachute systems, as well as other aerial-delivery equipment used by military personnel, and required that these items be managed using individual serial numbers. But serial number management would require an automated solution in order to be effective.

To address this challenge, the Army's Automated Identification and Movement Solutions (AMIS) division, in Alexandria, Va., created an enhanced Parachute Tracking System (ePTS) that employs radio frequency identification to provide end-to-end, verifiable chain-of-custody accountability, traceability and airworthiness of a sophisticated new family of personal parachute systems in support of global military operations. This enables the Army to view and manage main and reserve parachute processes, such as warehousing, inventory, packing, shipping, jumping and recovery.

At the parachute issue facility, T-11 mains and reserves that have been packed and passed all inspections are stored in metal bins, awaiting issue for operation use.
The ePTS pilot went live in November 2012, and remains in operation today at the 11th Quartermaster parachute pack and issue facilities at Fort Bragg, N.C., the largest of 42 facilities handling military parachutes, according to Bryan Keys, program management support specialist at AMIS. The new method provides a way to improve efficiency, fidelity and safety in managing and maintaining parachutes, he says. The RFID solution will soon be rolled out at all the other locations.

Looking for Improvements
In April 2008, AMIS product director Jim Alexander and other managers set out to find a solution for tracking parachutes. They concluded that an automatic identification technology (AIT) was required that would perform equally well whether a parachute was packed or unpacked. When a parachute is packed, Keys explains, its identifying labels are easily accessed, but for an unpacked parachute, personnel must search for the label in order for it to be read.

A rigger scans a T-11 deployment bag into ePTS.
Based on this and other criteria, managers decided that a passive RFID system would best meet the Army's needs. Passive RFID tags could be read through parachute bags as the parachutes were unpacked, and complemented the identification label by providing a unique electronic ID number for each parachute.

"Other AIT, such as bar codes, could not be utilized, as line-of-sight visibility would be lost when the T-11 [parachute] was in a packed status," Keys states. "Active RFID could meet the performance requirements. However, cost avoidance dictated that passive RFID would be the preferred solution."

To continue reading this article, please log in or choose a purchase option.

Option 1: Become a Premium Member.

One-year subscription, unlimited access to Premium Content: $189

Gain access to all of our premium content and receive 10% off RFID Reports and RFID Events!

Option 2: Purchase access to this specific article.

This article contains 1,941 words and 5 pages. Purchase Price: $19.99

Upgrade now, and you'll get immediate access to:

  • Case Studies

    Our in-dept case-study articles show you, step by step, how early adopters assessed the business case for an application, piloted it and rolled out the technology.

    Free Sample: How Cognizant Cut Costs by Deploying RFID to Track IT Assets

  • Best Practices

    The best way to avoid pitfalls is to know what best practices early adopters have already established. Our best practices have helped hundreds of companies do just that.

  • How-To Articles

    Don’t waste time trying to figure out how to RFID-enable a forklift, or deciding whether to use fixed or mobile readers. Our how-to articles provide practical advice and reliable answers to many implementation questions.

  • Features

    These informative articles focus on adoption issues, standards and other important trends in the RFID industry.

    Free Sample: Europe Is Rolling Out RFID

  • Magazine Articles

    All RFID Journal Premium Subscribers receive our bimonthly RFID Journal print magazine at no extra cost, and also have access to the complete online archive of magazine articles from past years.

Become a member today!

RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations