Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

Ask The Experts Forum

BlogsAsk The Experts ForumIs LF Technology Cheaper Than HF Technology?

Is LF Technology Cheaper Than HF Technology?

Posted By RFID Journal, 10.31.2014

I am working on a time-and-attendance tracking solution in which users would have an RFID card or inlay. Thus, we need an inexpensive RFID tag. Are low-frequency (LF) cards or adhesive inlays generally less expensive than high-frequency (HF) models?

—Name withheld


No, passive LF RFID transponders are generally around the same price as passive HF transponders. Both require a looped copper antenna. Passive ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) cards are generally a little cheaper, because the antenna can be printed and the manufacturing process is a little simpler since UHF doesn't use antenna loops. However, passive UHF might not be appropriate for some applications due to its longer read range.

I would caution against going with the cheapest solution available. While you can purchase passive HF transponders on paper stock, these likely wouldn't last very long in an employee's wallet. A plastic card would better protect an RFID inlay from damage.

—Mark Roberti, Founder and Editor, RFID Journal

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

Next Post
What UHF Tag Would Be Best to Tag Books ...
Previous Post
Why Don't Most VeriSign Webpages Related...
Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
Live Events Virtual Events Webinars
Simply enter a question for our experts.
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations
© Copyright 2002-2017 RFID Journal LLC.
Powered By: Haycco