PREMIUM = Requires Subscription. Learn More

RFID Journal Blog
Where the RFID Community Shares Ideas

Coverage of RFID Issues Is Improving

By Mark Roberti

Have you noticed that some articles about the use of radio frequency identification in passports are becoming more balanced? Despite the recent article in The Independent (see Independent Idiocy), coverage in the mainstream press otherwise seems to be improving.

RSS Feed
Previous May 2008 Next
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
       
RECENT ENTRIES
RFID Journal LIVE! on PBS Spacer Academics Chip in at LIVE! 2008 Spacer The Logistics Challenge That Is RFID Journal LIVE! Spacer RFID in Maintenance and Field Services Spacer
In a recent article in the L.A. Times, for instance, Jane Engle explained the concerns of privacy advocates about a proposal to use RFID in passports, and what the U.S. State Department did to address them (see How secure are U.S.' new 'smart' passports?). Ms. Engle pointed out that the RFID transponders are not foolproof, but concluded: "But its possible flaws, I suspect, needn't keep you up at night."

That's a long way from the nightmare scenarios spouted not too long ago.

In a follow-up article about new passport cards that enable people to travel between the United States and Canada or Mexico, the L.A. Times conducted a question-and-answer piece (see New passport card may be ready by April) that is free of any sensationalism.

Meanwhile, in an article on the new passport cards, FCW.com, the Web site of Federal Computer Week, spelled out criticisms from privacy experts and the response of government representatives (see Rule will make passport cards scannable from several feet away).

An article in the Washington Post, Electronic Passports Raise Privacy Issues was more slanted. It interviewed three people who criticized the use of ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) transponders in the cards without quoting anyone providing a counterpoint. But at least it didn't suggest RFID poses any ridiculous threat to life, liberty and happiness, as other more non-journalistic "articles" have done in the.

One of the few totally biased articles was a blog on the ComputerWeekly Web site, which just regurgitated old criticism of the use of RFID in passports without explaining that most of these issues have already been addressed (see RFID Passports). Still, by and large, the coverage has been more balanced and more informed that what we've seen previously.

Progress!


comments 3 Comments

The right link
Thanks Brian for pointing it out, the link text shown in the original post has a full stop which should not be part of the link, so posting it again below
http://www.freerfidcourse.com/">http://www.freerfidcourse.com

Posted By: Sam 2/12/08 at 12:24 AM
More education is the answer
The freerfidcourse link appears to be dead...

Posted By: Brian 2/6/08 at 12:48 PM
More education is the answer
You're right. The coverage overall has become more balanced, compared to the hysterical "Spychips" days, but more needs to be done. Our contribution has been a free e-learning course on RFID that anybody can download from http://www.freerfidcourse.com.
Hopefully the more people learn about RFID, the coverage about it will become positive.

Posted By: Sam 1/24/08 at 7:39 AM
Add Comment Add Your Comment:

Please enter your name or an alias and your email address.
Only your name or alias will appear in your post.
Name / Alias:
Email:   (will not be displayed)
Comment Title:
Comment:
 
 
SUBSCRIBE