The High Cost of Patent Trolls
Companies whose business is threatening alleged infringers exact money that could fund innovation.
Mar 05, 2012—As a child, I enjoyed the Norwegian fairy tale "The Three Billy Goats Gruff." In the story, the three goats need to cross a bridge to find food, but a troll threatens to gobble them up if they attempt to pass.
In the RFID world today, we, too, face trolls, only they're called "patent trolls"—people who hold generally worthless patents but threaten companies with legal action for infringing on them unless they pay a large fee. Often, trolls acquire patents for technology they did not develop, buying them for little money from companies that are bankrupt or not seeking to enforce them. Patent trolls do not build anything, nor do they intend to do so. Their entire business model is centered on threatening legal action for patent violation.
In the fairy tale, the troll makes a fatal error. The goats persuade him to obstruct just the biggest and strongest of the three, who simply knocks him off the bridge. The patent trolls have learned from this mistake: They never go after the big companies that might have pockets deep enough to fight them; they focus on smaller players, often startups, that can't afford the dollars or distraction of a fight.
These payments—really nothing more than legal blackmail—are a major drag on the RFID industry (most other tech industries face a similar plight). RFID technology providers could use that money to fund research and development to make better products, lower prices for end users or pay investors. Instead, it goes to people with no intention of ever making anything useful for the advancement of business or the betterment of humanity.
What's the solution? New patent laws—and there are two that could fix all this quickly. One would be to let companies defend themselves from trolls as a group—to take class actions to invalidate patent trolls' patents. The other would be to require anyone asserting a patent to be in the process of making a commercially useful product that incorporates the patent.
These new laws would be within the spirit of the current patent laws, which are intended to encourage useful innovation, but as far as I know, they are not being considered. Until they are, only the fairy tale has a happy ending.
Kevin Ashton was cofounder and executive director of the Auto-ID Center.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL