EPCglobal Provides Guidance for Container Tags

By Claire Swedberg

The organization's new guidelines specify the performance and usage of EPC Gen 2 RFID tags designed for tracking cargo, and are intended for tag vendors as well as logistics companies.

Members of GS1 EPCglobal's Transportation & Logistics Services Industry Action Group (TLS IAG) issued a set of guidelines this week specifying the physical and performance capabilities and characteristics for EPC Gen 2 passive RFID tags intended for use on containers that transport items via sea, by rail, or in trucks or trailers. The publication, known as the Technical Implementation Guide for Conveyance Asset Tag (CAT) Environmental Testing, also directs how tags are to be attached and encoded. The guidelines are intended to spell out the attributes, characteristics and performance capabilities that CAT tags must meet in order for each type of container and transportation mode (trucks and trailers, rail or air). EPCglobal hopes that tag manufacturers and transport industry companies will employ these specifications when testing and evaluating new tags, and thereby increase the reliability of tags used for tracking freight.

Members of the logistics industry can follow the guidelines when evaluating and testing tags, and when encoding the tags and attaching them to containers. In addition, tag vendors can utilize the guidelines as criteria when testing their own products for use on containers.

Logistics companies face challenges in managing customers' products using a variety of identification methods and technologies, from handwritten serial numbers to bar codes and passive and active RFID tags, explains Tony Hollis, the director of product development and innovation at logistics firm Exel, a division of DHL Supply Chain Americas, and a cochair of the group. Exel/DHL ships product for other companies, and tracks those goods with RFID tags on its containers. "We found there were a lot of different standards that went into labeling things," Hollis says, and the group aimed to develop a standard that businesses like Exel/DHL, as well as their customers, can follow in order to "tag these assets in a reliable manner."

Companies currently use a variety of methods for tracking containers and their cargo—either manually, using pen and paper, or via an auto-ID technology, such as bar coding or radio frequency identification. "Certainly, there are a host of tracking opportunities out there," Hollis states. "We wanted to see what we could do to facilitate a standard that would help us all get away from using clipboards [for handwritten data about containers]," by ensuring there was a standard automated RFID system that all members of the supply chain could utilize.

The other members of the GS1 group who contributed to the guidelines were representatives from iControl Inc., Damco, Boeing, SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego and FedEx. In addition, Hollis says, over the course of several years of standards meetings held around the globe, "there were many technology providers, transportation and service providers, manufacturers and retailer companies involved in these discussions."

The group began meeting in 2008 to discuss tag performance criteria, as well as shippers' requirements for the tags they used, including the tags' need to operate under a range of environmental conditions, including heat, dust, static, cold, ice and moisture. "We need a tag that could survive these kinds of conditions," Hollis says. The groups' members also discussed the types of data that should be stored on the tag. Members created the protocol for a platform to accommodate existing data-storage methods, such as storing specific critical information regarding a container. The protocol requires that tags have a read-only data area encoding with a unique identifier, while an optional read/write data area could be used, for example, for recording the container's length, as well as its gross and tare weight, or the number of pieces being shipped.

The guidelines dictate where a tag should be attached to each type of container—directing, for instance, that for a unit load device (ULD) used on aircraft, tags should be located in the edge rail of the base of the container adjacent to a corner. The tag must be electronically secure and tamper-proof, installed with fasteners or adhesives approved for such uses, and with a minimum life of five years or 200,000 reads. What's more, a fixed RFID reader must be capable of reading a tag at distances of up to at least 5 meters (16.4 feet).

The guidelines are based on the results of three pilots undertaken by GS1, which involved tracking shipments with RFID through an international supply chain (see EPCglobal Transportation and Logistics Pilot Takes Visibility to a Global Level).

"For us, the guidelines offer an opportunity to enhance customer satisfaction," Hollis says, by ensuring a standard tagging system that Exel/DHL can use to improve supply chain visibility.

EPCglobal also released its RTI (Pallet Tagging) Guideline, developed by the organization's Returnable Transport Item (RTI) Interest Group. In this case, the group—which included companies that manufacture pallets, in addition to logistics service providers—focused on describing how to apply Gen 2 RFID tags to pallets, roll cages, returnable plastic containers, tote boxes and ingredient bins. The guidelines include recommendations for the identification key (or unique ID number) used on the tags, as well as the best tag placement for reading tagged pallets (two tags positioned at each diagonal corner of the pallet) throughout the supply chain—for example, at points in which pallets are unloaded from a vehicle to a goods receipt area, and as they are read in single and multiple pallet combinations. The RTI study also took into consideration how pallets may need to be read in the event of a product recall, during the picking process or when a pallet is ready for shipment.