|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
Team to Develop Standards for Testing RFID in Health Care
AIM Global, MET Labs and Georgia Tech will develop testing protocols for detecting electromagnetic interference caused by RFID transmissions, and for determining the effects of such interference on medical devices.
Jun 02, 2009—AIM Global, in collaboration with the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) and MET Laboratories, will begin developing testing protocols for RFID technology in the health-care setting, as well as the effects RFID may have on implantable medical devices. If all goes as planned, says AIM Global's president, Dan Mullen, the testing guidelines to be developed by the group will be presented to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval by December of this year. The group signed an agreement last week, and intends to commence the project immediately.
The project, known as the AIM Global Healthcare Initiative, is being overseen by AIM Global's RFID Experts Group (REG), which includes representatives from 40 organizations with experts in RFID technology, in the United States, Europe and Asia. These include MET Labs, GTRI, GS1, Avery Dennison and Feig Electronic. MET Labs, GTRI and AIM Global will determine specific guidelines to test for electromagnetic interference (EMI) that could result from RFID transmissions, as well as how they may affect the function of medical devices. The resulting protocols, Mullen says, would provide RFID vendors and medical device manufacturers with a comprehensive guide for testing the RFID technology they may be introducing into a hospital or other health-care environment.
New RFID Study Finds No Interference With Medical Devices and UCLA Group Offers Interference-Testing Service for Medical Devices). In 2008, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a Dutch study suggesting the possibility that RFID might pose an interference risk in health-care facilities (see Researchers Warn RFID May Disrupt Medical Equipment and Dutch RFID Interference Study Is a Worst-Case Test).
There are no formal guidelines, however, regarding testing for RFID interference with medical devices. That, Mullen says, is due to the fact that radio frequency identification is still a fairly recent inclusion in the health-care environment. But increasingly, hospitals are employing RFID devices to track patients, assets and staff members. In addition, there is little research to provide details as to how RFID in public places—libraries and retail locations, for instance—could affect the operation of medical implants, such as cardiac pacemakers.
To address the growing need for RFID emission testing standards, the REG first established a committee in 2008, seeking partners to work with AIM Global to develop the protocols. As a result, both GTRI and MET Labs have agreed to participate in the research, as well as provide their labs as sites at which to conduct testing, and to serve as simulated clinical health-care environments.
MET Labs, an independent third-party testing laboratory, had already been undertaking safety testing for electronic medical devices, says Ted Osinski, the organization's director of RFID systems. Approximately five years ago, MET Labs began providing RFID testing for nonprofit standards organization EPCglobal. Since that time, he notes, medical device manufacturers have been asking, 'Can you tell us the impact of RFID?'
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL
|RFID Journal LIVE!||RFID in Health Care||LIVE! LatAm||LIVE! Brasil||LIVE! Europe||RFID Connect||Virtual Events||RFID Journal Awards||Webinars||Presentations|