|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
Déjà Vu All Over Again
As they did with Wal-Mart, many suppliers are assuming Sam's Club will back off its EPC tagging requirements.
I believe Sam's Club will adjust its rollout plan based on feedback from suppliers, as well as its own experience in deploying the technology. The company might initially focus on a smaller set of suppliers, or on a smaller set of sellable units (a category-by-category rollout would make sense to me). So some suppliers might have additional time to get up to speed, but I would be shocked if Sam's Club dramatically scales back or abandons the rollout entirely.
There are a couple of reasons I say this. First, Sam's Club did not go into this blindly. When Wal-Mart launched its EPC efforts in 2003, no one yet had real experience with ultrahigh-frequency UHF RFID or open supply chain applications. Five years later, however, Sam's Club has a wealth of learnings from which to draw upon—from the Wal-Mart team, and from the suppliers that have worked with Wal-Mart.
Second, although Sam's Club's plan is more ambitious than Wal-Mart's in that it focuses on sellable units (individual items in multiple cases) rather than on cases, there are factors that make the Sam's rollout easier. Sam's Club has fewer suppliers than Wal-Mart, and it carries fewer stock-keeping units (SKUs). That means there are fewer suppliers to bring on board, and far fewer products to figure out how to tag—and how to gain benefits from tagging them.
In many instances, suppliers have created special SKUs—a 12-pack of razor blades, for instance, or a 42-ounce bottle of ketchup—that they sell only to Sam's, or to a couple of other stores (BJ's and Costco). Managing tagged inventory of a special SKU for one of three retailers is easier than for an SKU sold to dozens, or even hundreds, of retail partners.
Some companies that sell low volumes to Sam's could possibly get away with a slap-and-ship approach, but for those selling high volumes, the labor costs will be too high. Having special SKUs makes it easier to adopt an automated approach to tagging, because you don't have to worry that a tiny percentage of your output needs to be tagged. All of it, or at least a good portion of it, can be tagged.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
|RFID Journal LIVE!||RFID in Health Care||LIVE! LatAm||LIVE! Brasil||LIVE! Europe||RFID Connect||Virtual Events||RFID Journal Awards||Webinars||Presentations|