|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
Washington State House Gives Nod to Privacy Bill
The state's house of representatives approved a bill that would make RFID "skimming" a felony and prohibit capturing data from an RFID tag in an identity card without the cardholder's permission.
Feb 15, 2008—A revised version of legislation intended to protect the privacy of individuals using RFID tags with "unique personal identifier numbers" passed the Washington State House of Representatives on Wednesday. House Bill (HB) 1031—intended to limit collection of personal information from an RFID tag without the tag holder's knowledge or consent—passed with 69 to 27 votes. The bill is now headed for the State Senate and, if approved, to the office of Governor Christine Gregoire.
This is the second round for HB 1031. An earlier version failed to pass a House vote in March 2007 (see Washington's RFID Bill Halted). In its original form, HB 1031 was rejected because of its broad scope, says the bill's primary sponsor, State Representative Jeff Morris (D-Mount Vernon). Known at that time as the "Electronic Bill of Rights," the first version did not offer exemptions for a host of users, including emergency responders, university researchers and service providers such as cable companies. The revised bill also has eliminated mention of a labeling requirement ("A person shall not sell, use, or distribute an item that contains an electronic communication device without labeling such item with a notice stating that such item contains an electronic device capable of engaging in electronic communication"). Such a requirement was opposed by business associations and technology vendors, who argue that they already have labeling conduct codes in place through organizations such as EPCglobal.
On the other hand, use of data for marketing purposes, by a retailer would be a civil offense with a fine of up to $10,000 for each violation at the attorney general's discretion.
If, for example, a consumer holding an RFID-enabled loyalty card from one store enters a second store, that second store could not make use of the data stored on the loyalty card under the bill. Also, when a consumer applies for a loyalty card or other identification card containing an RFID tag, the application process must inform the consumer about the use of RFID technology and the user would need to sign that notification to indicate acceptance.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL