|Home||Internet of Things||Aerospace||Apparel||Energy||Defense||Health Care||Logistics||Manufacturing||Retail|
Canadian Grocery Pilot Finds ROI in RFID
By implementing RFID, retailers and suppliers should markedly reduce out-of-stocks and improve promotional execution, according to a seven-month project involving Loblaw and four of its suppliers.
Jun 20, 2007—Canadian grocery retailers and suppliers can expect to see a return on investment in reduced out-of-stocks and better promotional management from the implemention of radio frequency identification, according to findings from a seven-month RFID pilot involving Canadian grocery distributor and retailer Loblaw. The pilot also involved several of Loblaw's suppliers: Maple Leaf Foods, General Mills Canada, Kruger Products Ltd. (formerly Scott Paper Ltd.) and Unilever Canada.
Other pilot participants included the Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors (CCGD) and Food & Consumer Products of Canada (FCPC), as well as RFID technology vendors Motorola and Intermec.
Canadian RFID Center steering committee. For retailers building a new store or starting a new supplier partnership, Wilkes states, it's essential to ensure that RFID technology be worked into future planning.
Grocery suppliers can come to a similar conclusion from the study, says Elaine Smith, senior vice president of FCPC. "For an initiative as large as RFID, there's a huge learning curve," Smith says. What the pilot has illustrated for suppliers, she explains, "is that the big news is not going to be the cost of hardware—it's the integration piece." Smith urges suppliers to begin what could be a three- to five-year process for planning and installing an RFID system. "The suppliers' message is to get the systems integration piece in place," she says. "As you look at upgrading systems, you need to look at integrating the RFID [into your existing inventory or warehouse management system] and build RFID into your systems integration planning," so that the system is in place when the supplier is ready to purchase hardware.
According to the white paper, retailers will see the earliest payback from RFID in the supply chain. However, both suppliers and retailers can ultimately expect to see benefits from the technology. The greatest return on investment for retailers, says Wilkes, will come from reductions in store out-of-stocks and improvements in promotional-display management.
During the pilot, RFID reduced out-of-stocks by increasing receiving accuracy and stock visibility in the back room, resulting in more efficient replenishment, both in the back room and on shelves. For example, the researchers found that when a product showed no sales for a five-day period, they could determine the items were unavailable on the floor and were, in fact, stored in the back room. With RFID, they were also able to locate those backroom items so they could be moved to the front of the store.
Tag data can likewise be used to determine if promotional items were delivered from the back room to the sales floor by the required date—and, if they weren't, to discern whether the product is available in the back room.
For suppliers, the results were less definitive. Payback on RFID investments was less pronounced for companies that had to pay for additional labor to attach tags to cartons and pallets, as well as for the cost of RFID hardware and software. Work-in-progress and raw-material tracking, which could benefit manufacturers, were not part of this study.
Login and post your comment!
Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS
Simply enter a question for our experts.
TAKE THE POLL