Home Internet of Things Aerospace Apparel Energy Defense Health Care Logistics Manufacturing Retail

The $42 Billion Problem

Shrinkage continues to plague retailers. RFID is no silver bullet, but it can be part of the solution.
By Mark Roberti
Still, RFID might play a role in other areas. The largest cause of shrinkage in the United States is not shoplifting, but employee theft. The survey put the 2006 losses at $19.5 billion, representing nearly half (47 percent) of the total shrinkage problem, while shoplifting accounted for $13.3 billion (about one-third).

RFID could potentially reduce employee theft. Here's how: Let's say you're selling video cameras, digital cameras, iPods and the like. These are expensive items, small enough to slip into a pocketbook or coat pocket; the same is true for lingerie, video games, music CDs and other oft-stolen items. Some companies put these high-value items in locked cases or cages, but an employee could open a locked case with a key and pocket an item, with no way to identify the culprit.

With an RFID-enabled lock, however, employees would have to swipe their ID badges, identifying who opened the case. If the items were tagged and the shelves equipped with interrogators, a retailer would know which employee removed which item. That would cut down on theft—at least until employees figured out how to beat the system.

Two other areas where RFID could play a role is in reducing administrative errors ($5.8 billion, or 14 percent of shrinkage) and vendor fraud ($1.7 billion, or 4 percent). Administrative errors occur when, for instance, a retailer records that it received 10 cases but actually received only eight. Vendor fraud, on the other hand, would be the case if a vendor were to claim it shipped the 10 cases but had only shipped eight. In both cases, retailers lose because of the cost involved with performing manual counts. By reading RFID tags on cases when they arrive at a distribution center or store, retailers could reduce this kind of shrinkage.

Some consumer advocates will complain that RFID is not a good antitheft technology because it could result in a loss of privacy, for both consumers and workers. What these people don't understand is that theft is a criminal activity that hurts consumers, as the $42 billion in losses is passed on to those consumers. That's about $140 for every man, woman and child in the United States. RFID will never eliminate theft—nothing ever will—but it can be another tool in the ongoing war against criminals.

Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal. If you would like to comment on this article, click on the link below.

Login and post your comment!

Not a member?

Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com!

Case Studies Features Best Practices How-Tos
Simply enter a question for our experts.
RFID Journal LIVE! RFID in Health Care LIVE! LatAm LIVE! Brasil LIVE! Europe RFID Connect Virtual Events RFID Journal Awards Webinars Presentations