|
||||||
| Home | Aerospace | Apparel | CPG | Defense | Health Care | Logistics | Manufacturing | Pharma | Retail |
Android Industries' Auto Subassembly Plant Boosts EfficiencyThe company cuts labor costs by 10 percent and improves safety, by using Zebra Technologies' Material Flow system for parts replenishment.
Dec 18, 2012—Automotive subassembly company Android Industries reports that it has reduced the labor cost of its inventory and operations replenishment by 10 percent, using a combination radio frequency identification and bar-code solution provided by Zebra Technologies. The system, installed two years ago at the company's facility in Arlington, Texas, allows workers to use either an RFID tag or a bar-code scan to order parts from the warehouse, while warehouse workers retrieving the goods can view the order on their onboard computers via Zebra's Material Flow software application.
Android Industries assembles complex modular systems, including instrument panels and vehicle assemblies, and ships those units to its customers' car and truck factories. Its business has been growing, the company reports, and it continues to employ lean manufacturing practices to keep costs low.
If an operator's parts supply is getting low, he can press the button on the WhereCall V tag, which will transmit a replenishment request.
Before installing the Material Flow replenishment system, Android Industries used a manual method to keep its assembly staff furnished with the parts required for the task at hand, says Dirk Cranney, Android Industries' material manager. Workers from the warehouse would drive through the facility's assembly areas, searching for component containers with low levels of parts, and would then locate a replenishment supply of those components. Assembly workers, known as operators, would either send a message via radio or simply shout out to those individuals when they needed parts, or they would place a piece of paper on top of any components boxes they had emptied, indicating the need for replenishment. The warehouse staff had to remember where those parts were located within the warehouse, and then find them and bring them to the operator. As the Arlington site—the company's largest—was growing, several buildings were added, totaling 750,000 square feet of storage area. What's more, goods were often stored farther from the assembly area, and the assembly area itself was becoming larger. All combined, this created a greater challenge for staff members attempting to manage replenishment via the manual system. Operators might not find someone in the area within hearing range to ask for replacement parts, or workers may have trouble locating parts within the warehouse, or miss an empty parts box on the assembly floor that required replenishment. Login and post your comment!Not a member? Signup for an account now to access all of the features of RFIDJournal.com! |
PREMIUM CONTENT
SEND IT YOUR WAY
RFID JOURNAL EVENTS
ASK THE EXPERTS Simply enter a question for our experts. JOIN THE CONVERSATION ON TWITTER | ||||||||||
|
ARTICLES
PREMIUM CONTENT
|