Now, the CIO at most companies is more akin to the head of facilities, whose job it is to maintain and repair buildings and equipment, and to generally keep things running. Most CIOs, in my experience, see their job as maintaining IT systems, repairing network outages and generally keeping equipment running.
CIOs do, of course, evaluate new hardware and software, and they make investment decisions—but these decisions are often about how to maintain existing IT infrastructure more cost-effectively. There has been a focus on business intelligence software in the past few years, but such applications are mainly about parsing existing information, rather than acquiring new data or valuing existing information.
To my knowledge, most CIOs do not actively try to get new and better information for their companies. If they did, they would be all over
radio frequency identification, which has the potential to provide a vast amount of new data regarding what is happening within a company, within a supply chain and within a partner's operations. Instead, most CIOs to whom I've spoken see
RFID as a burden—an additional infrastructure they must maintain. "The last thing I want are thousands of additional boxes," one CIO said to me a few years ago, referring to RFID readers.
If there are CIOs who have developed formulas to value information, I have yet to
read about them. Is there, for instance, a CIO at any retail organization who has put an actual dollar value on information about an item's location within a store? You might say you can't put a price on that, but I disagree. A lack of information leads to a specific number of out-of-stocks, which then leads to a certain number of lost sales. And those lost sales lead to less profit.
So how many out-of-stocks occur, how many lost sales take place and how much profit is lost? The number might be very small—perhaps 5 cents per item. Or the number might be much more significant. But if CIOs put a value on information, then they could compare the cost of any new system, such as RFID, with that of not having the information these systems provide. One might find that the cost of an RFID system, amortized over five years, is 10 cents per item, and that the value of the information is much more—or less—than that. This would be a basis for determining whether to invest in RFID and other systems that could provide new information to senior executives.
Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal.
If you would like to comment on this article, click on the link below. To read more of Mark's opinions, visit the RFID Journal Blog or the Editor's Note archive.
READERS' COMMENTS
two sources
Also looking. Found two interesting studies on the value of information identified and captured via RFID. First is 244 pages with numerous references. Second is 12 pages. 1. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/11/07/84/PDF/Evren.pdf 2. www.airl-logistique.org/fr/files/?view=304 still looking
Posted By: J. Wayman 11/29/2010 at 6:33:45 PM