More RFID Journal Sites: RFID Journal Espanol RFID Journal Brasil RFID Journal Events RFID Journal Awards
Aerospace EDITOR'S NOTE
Text size:
T
T
T
The Truth About RFID Adoption
I spoke with Brad Cougher, who works in Alan Estevez's office at the DOD, and asked, "There are reports that only 4,000 of the DOD's 50,000 suppliers are tagging for the department today—is that true and, if so, why so few?" His response: "Is 4,000 a small number? We think that's pretty good." And he did have a point. While the DOD does have some 50,000 companies from which it might purchase items, he added, it only has about 10,000 to 15,000 core suppliers. Therefore, that 4,000 number represents anywhere from 27 to 40 percent of its major suppliers.
I asked Cougher why the DOD purchased 3,000 RFID printers if it expected suppliers to tag goods. Some have speculated the department might be tagging goods as well, which would explain why it hasn't been pushing suppliers to move more quickly. Cougher answered that the DOD bought the printers for internal use because it has cases of goods currently in inventory that are not tagged and would like to track those goods with RFID. No doubt, the Defense Logistics Agency, which ships goods to the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, also breaks down pallets and reconstitutes them, so it might want to place tags on mixed pallets.
HP has not been accused of backing off its RFID effort, but many have pointed out that it is among the few electronics manufacturers to embrace RFID and EPC technologies. Chenneveau said he was very bullish on Wal-Mart's efforts, in fact, and that HP was continuing to work with the retailer. He also said he wasn't sure why other electronics manufacturers aren't using RFID in their manufacturing and supply chain operations, but predicted they soon would be.
Some claim HP's big RFID project in Brazil, which won the first-ever RFID Journal Award for Best Implementation (see Keeping Tabs on Printers), was a demonstration project intended to show HP's services customers that it has RFID expertise. I asked Chenneveau if that was true, and he replied, "I'm not running a charity. There have to be business benefits."
I honestly didn't get the sense anyone on the panel was spinning. They discussed some of the issues affecting their deployments, but indicated they've been making significant progress, which was encouraging. And after the session ended, I joked to the audience that the next day they would wake up and read that Wal-Mart was backing off its RFID efforts. Sure enough, I received a Google Alert with a link to this story: Cover Story: Wal-Mart's Faltering RFID Initiative. Hey, what are you going to do?
Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal. If you would like to comment on this article, click on the link below.
more Aerospace articles
I asked Cougher why the DOD purchased 3,000 RFID printers if it expected suppliers to tag goods. Some have speculated the department might be tagging goods as well, which would explain why it hasn't been pushing suppliers to move more quickly. Cougher answered that the DOD bought the printers for internal use because it has cases of goods currently in inventory that are not tagged and would like to track those goods with RFID. No doubt, the Defense Logistics Agency, which ships goods to the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, also breaks down pallets and reconstitutes them, so it might want to place tags on mixed pallets.
HP has not been accused of backing off its RFID effort, but many have pointed out that it is among the few electronics manufacturers to embrace RFID and EPC technologies. Chenneveau said he was very bullish on Wal-Mart's efforts, in fact, and that HP was continuing to work with the retailer. He also said he wasn't sure why other electronics manufacturers aren't using RFID in their manufacturing and supply chain operations, but predicted they soon would be.
Some claim HP's big RFID project in Brazil, which won the first-ever RFID Journal Award for Best Implementation (see Keeping Tabs on Printers), was a demonstration project intended to show HP's services customers that it has RFID expertise. I asked Chenneveau if that was true, and he replied, "I'm not running a charity. There have to be business benefits."
I honestly didn't get the sense anyone on the panel was spinning. They discussed some of the issues affecting their deployments, but indicated they've been making significant progress, which was encouraging. And after the session ended, I joked to the audience that the next day they would wake up and read that Wal-Mart was backing off its RFID efforts. Sure enough, I received a Google Alert with a link to this story: Cover Story: Wal-Mart's Faltering RFID Initiative. Hey, what are you going to do?
Mark Roberti is the founder and editor of RFID Journal. If you would like to comment on this article, click on the link below.
