Retail NEWS Text size: T T T

Wal-Mart, Suppliers Affirm RFID Benefits

The RFID team is not being disbanded, Langford explains, but is instead playing a supporting role. "The core team is still here and is interacting with operations to ensure that the knowledge that we've gained over the past five years is passed on to operations as they create the roadmap for where they would like to see this initiative taken," he says. "We are identifying lots of new opportunities and are prioritizing those. The operational side has dedicated teams to step up and deliver the process changes enabled by the technology to the stores. So we are working on the same priorities in lockstep."

The Wall Street Journal article deemed the RFID effort a failure because it hasn't reduced costs. However, Langford points out that the focus of the retailer's RFID efforts has been on improving on-shelf availability and creating value not just for Wal-Mart, but also for customers, who benefit from finding the items they want to buy, and suppliers, who benefit from the increase in sales.

"We've really been focused on changing the service we give to our customers and driving value for suppliers and ourselves," he says. "That's been our primary goal—to focus on collaborative benefits right from the outset, rather than focus only on internal efficiencies. We understand that there are some suppliers out there, if you go looking for them, that don't understand our vision, but that's just an educational process."

Wal-Mart is seeing some inventory reductions due to EPC RFID. Manual orders are down 10 to 15 percent in stores utilizing RFID, which means that staff are not overriding the system and ordering goods that might, in fact, be in the back of the store. But the real benefits will likely come as more cases are tagged and more data is available. Working together, Wal-Mart and its suppliers can use the data to improve replenishment based on the improved visibility RFID provides.

Wal-Mart is sending data from RFID-enabled stores back to each of its 600 suppliers tagging pallets, cases and promotional displays within 30 minutes of a tag being read. This data has enabled such suppliers as Campbell Soup Co., Kimberly-Clark and Procter & Gamble (P&G) to measure the execution of promotions and boost sales.

"We're already seeing value," says Campbell Soup CIO Doreen Wright. "It's hard to dispute the value of this technology." She says Campbell Soup has been tagging displays for large-scale promotions, analyzing the data it gets back from Wal-Mart to determine which stores are executing properly, then working with Wal-Mart to get displays out to the floor at those stores that haven't gotten them out on time.

READERS' COMMENTS

  • Wal-Mart WSJ report

    I think that the WSJ report should be interpreted by Wal-mart as how it can improve on communication to it's vendors specifically. Wal-mart's RFID message changes, RFID communication is not clear and RFID for most of it's vendors is misunderstood; I've attended too many Wal-Mart RFID supplier meetings only to hear vendors and Wal-Mart top guys fail to communicate. It is good to hear for the first time that RFID has been handed off to operations within Wal-Mart. As an IT person implementing RFID, it is impossible to get traction from my sales folks when Wal-Mart Sales and RFID/IT aren't on the same page as far as communication.

    Posted By: G. Lopez-Robles 2/22/2007 at 9:48:02 AM

  • Wal-Mart RFID fizzle?

    This article denies the Wall Street Journal's claims while simultaneously confirming them. The fact is, Wal-Mart under Linda Dillman was clearly mandating case-level RFID across the board. She told MSN Money Magazine that "they would not invest more time in suppliers that are reluctant..." The major CPG's co-opted the initiative to meet their ends -- namely to insure store-level compliance with promotional product in which they give Wal-Mart significant funds for executing. No compliance -- no funds. The use of RFID for promotions does benefit suppliers, consumers, and Wal-mart; but it is not the vision Dillman had for the technology. It also confirms that the ROI at the DC's isn't there -- which again was a major thrust of the initiative early on. Finally, it confirms that using RFID to locate general merchandise among a sea of boxes in the back room doesn't work either. For example, cases in the box bailer waiting to be recycled continue to transmit data when the stock room is interrogated. A bit of a problem with no obvious solution. RFID does make sense for tracking P-O-P compliance, but that will fail to generate the kind of impact that Wal-Mart originally suggested by many orders of magnitude. RFID will be useful in retail and Wal-Mart blazed the trail, but their initiative as originally conceived has in fact fizzled. Why not redefine the initiative honestly and move on?

    Posted By: K. Rohleder 2/22/2007 at 10:01:55 AM

post a comment


Login and post your comment!

Forgot your password?


Not a member?
Signup for an account now to access all the features of RFIDJournal.com.




more Retail articles

PREMIUM CONTENT
TOOLS & RESOURCES
RFID Journal Virtual Events

sending it your way

Sign up for one of our E-Newsletters.

Enter Your Email Address:

take the poll

Are you concerned about your present or potential RFID technology provider going bankrupt?

RFID EVENTS

RFID Journal LIVE! 2012
Apr. 3-5, 2012
Orlando, Fla.

RFID Journal LIVE! Europe—Scandinavia
Oct. 24-25, 2012
Oslo, Norway

RFID BUYER’S GUIDE

Looking for RFID Products and Services?
Search the RFID Buyer’s guide to resources.

Private RFID Executive Education
C-Level executives get Up to speed quickly.
rfidjournal.com/execed
Get Pay-Per Click Ads on RFID Journal
More qualified leads than Google.
rfidjournal.com/textads