For the use case tests, ODIN utilized three different sample pharmaceutical form factors: a standard pill bottle, a standard bottle of a liquid medicine and a blister pack with a foil backing and Mylar cover. All of the tagged products were in motion during the tests, traveling at 15 feet, 25 feet or 75 feet per minute, based on suggested metrics from the pharmaceutical company representatives ODIN consulted prior to the testing.
The first use case was inline verification of tagged product moving down a conveyor. The second was item-to-case verification, in which ODIN attempted to
read both the closely packed
item-level tags inside cases (quantity of 48 per case), and the case tags, while the cases were moving through an interrogation
portal. The third use case was based on reading pallets of tagged items and cases moving through a portal
reader.
UHF tags performed well in only two of these use cases, Sweeney explains, whereas HF performed well in all three. The tests are based on hardware and tags available to end users today in production quantities, he notes.
In addition to putting tags through the three use-case tests, ODIN ran 100 samples of each tag model through five different
RFID performance tests, carried out on static tags in a lab environment. The company measured read distance, or how the strength of this link changed as the distance between the tag and
interrogator grew; how the
orientation of the tag to the interrogator's
antenna affected the tag being successfully read; how nearby materials (such as metal and conductive liquids) affected read rates; the speed at which the tag could be encoded; and the tag quality, or how consistently each 100-tag sample performed.
According to ODIN, measuring the
tag's orientation sensitivity to the antenna is especially important, because distributors and other supply chain partners may not have control over the orientation of tags on bottles of drugs cased and enclosed on a pallet transported through the supply chain.
ODIN is selling the report through its
Web site store for $395. The report details how each test was conducted and how tags of each
frequency fared. Sweeney says that while HF is the clear winner today, "that might change as innovations [in tag design and capability] come to market. HF is an older technology," he says, "but there have been more innovations in UHF technology in recent years that allow more capabilities than [UHF] used to have."