7. In some cases,
RFID passive tags received from vendors can be damaged during manufacture, in transit or when encapsulated. Thus, it would be wise to test each and every tag before placing them on objects. This way, you can avoid a reduced
read rate due to damaged tags.
8. When performing a test for
read rates, make a point to understand the radiation pattern of the
interrogator antenna rather than just doing a trial-and-error test with the tags. An optimum combination of tag
orientation, antenna direction and radiation pattern provides the best-read rates.
9. Keeping the
UHF RFID tags in close physical proximity to each other can render some tags ineffective. Nevertheless, a more complex signaling algorithm, such as
frequency hopping, can actually help increase performance levels.
10. If you plan to apply UHF RFID tags to liquid-based items, such as bottles of juice or water, understand that the effective
read range of these tags would be drastically reduced as shorter-wave tags are more susceptible to absorption by liquids. Nevertheless, read range can be improved marginally by having a spacer between the tag and the object.
11. An
RFID tag's lifespan can vary, depending on the application, business processes and other environmental factors involved. For example, in the supply chain, tag life may end once a product reaches the consumer; in cases of assembly line tracking, the end-point may be when the finished good is produced; and in asset-tracking scenarios, a tag's lifespan may be most subject to wear and tear. Whatever the lifespan, RFID solution providers need to simulate the various internal and external factors that can impact tag performance over a period of time. For example, what are the minimum and maximum temperatures that a tag can withstand, and for how long? And what would the impact be if the tag were physically handled—that is, removed from one object and reused on another—a thousand times per year? Answering these questions can help determine the kind of tag and encapsulation required.
12. Finally, when using a handheld UHF RFID
reader for discrete
item-level stock taking, make sure to set an optimum
attenuation so the handheld interrogator doesn’t read superfluous tags. In such situations, a reader fitted with a circularly polarized antenna and set for high attenuation (low signal strength) would be ideal. In applications involving a search for out-of-sight objects, however, a linear polarized antenna with high power would be a preferable choice.
There are, of course, other parameters to consider when implementing a UHF passive RFID solution. Still, with these 12 critical constraints in mind, the process becomes that much smoother.
Vinod Kankaria is an RFID consultant based in Chennai, India.
READERS' COMMENTS
RFID vs Barcode
Finally we have a realistic report from the trenches. Mr. Kankaria’s report on the many flaws of the application of UHF RFID in the supply chain confirms many of the points I have written about the use of RFID vs Barcode*. After reading the article we can conclude that there is one major advantage of Barcode over RFID, and that is that the user need not be a scientist to deploy Barcode. Anyone who is not blind can do it. Perhaps now the privacy advocates can relax since it appears that RFID tracking is not any better than Barcode which has been around for more than 30 years. * http://www.aidc100.org/RFID-vs-Bar-Codes.344.0.html
Posted By: C. Kapsambelis 5/08/2006 at 7:24:58 AM
RFID issues
Vinod's article is good and practical. It covers a lot of his experience and is very important for anyone strting to enter this field. I wish he would have covered more aspects of the limitations of the RFID in other sectors and also dwelled upon the latest developments in RFID technologies. Overall the article was usefull and apt at this point of time.
Posted By: P. Kundurthy 5/08/2006 at 11:58:45 PM